Employee looking over packing
How to Evaluate Your Ecommerce Fulfillment Operation After the Holiday Rush
January 19, 2026

What Ecommerce Holiday Sales Reports Miss About Fulfillment Performance

Holiday sales reports are designed to tell a specific story.

They show revenue growth, conversion rates, average order value, and peak shopping days. For many brands, those numbers looked strong in 2025. In fact, U.S. online holiday sales reached roughly $258 billion, growing close to 7 percent year over year, and Cyber Week once again delivered record-setting volume.

In sales reports, the season looked like a win.

But what ecommerce holiday sales reports miss about fulfillment performance is how those results were delivered. Sales performance only confirms that customers were buying. It does not confirm that the fulfillment system performed well under pressure.

Behind the scenes, many teams experienced something different. Orders came faster, volume lasted longer, and the effort required to maintain service levels increased. January is when those results surface, and when brands begin to see that sales performance alone does not explain how well their fulfillment operation actually performed under sustained demand.

How revenue growth hides fulfillment failures.

One of the biggest challenges with evaluating peak season performance is that revenue growth can mask operational breakdowns. Demand does not stop when fulfillment struggles. Orders still flow even when systems are strained.

During the 2025 holiday season, order volume did not spike for a single weekend and then return to normal. Many brands experienced sustained peaks across Cyber Week, Giving Tuesday, and late-season shipping cutoffs. Industry data showed peak days reaching three to four times normal daily order volume. That pressure persisted longer than many fulfillment operations were designed to handle.

At the same time, industry estimates showed that roughly 10–12 percent of holiday packages arrived late, even as revenue climbed. This is where ecommerce holiday sales reports miss about fulfillment performance most clearly. Sales reports reflected growth, while fulfillment systems quietly fell behind delivery promises.

Revenue growth continues because customers place orders. Fulfillment failures show up later through missed SLAs, customer complaints, refunds, and margin loss. That delay is exactly why sales reports feel complete while critical performance issues remain hidden.

The fulfillment story lives between the numbers.

Fulfillment performance shows up in places that sales dashboards do not track. It shows up in carrier escalations, inventory buffers that deplete faster than planned, and unplanned labor added to protect ship times.

In 2025, mobile accounted for more than 56 percent of online holiday purchases, which raised expectations for fast confirmation, accurate delivery promises, and real-time updates. At the same time, generative AI began influencing a growing share of ecommerce discovery, contributing to sharper and less predictable demand spikes.

For many brands, fulfillment systems held together, but performance margins narrowed. Small delays compounded. Inventory accuracy slipped. Recovery windows shortened. These outcomes rarely stop sales in the moment, but they significantly increase operational risk and downstream cost.

Where fulfillment performance quietly erodes margin.

The most damaging fulfillment failures do not stop orders from shipping. However, they do erode margin quietly through:

  • Late deliveries that increase customer service volume and compensation costs.
  • Inventory inaccuracies that drive reships and refunds.
  • Overtime labor that inflates cost per order.
  • Expedited shipping becomes routine rather than exceptional.

In addition, industry projections placed holiday return rates near 18 to 20 percent, which added reverse logistics pressure at the same time teams were still shipping at peak volume. None of those costs appear in revenue totals, but they surface quickly when Q1 financials are reviewed.

Sales reports celebrate volume, but fulfillment performance determines whether that volume was profitable or simply expensive.

Why peak season exposes structural weaknesses.

Peak season does not introduce new problems, but reveals whether your systems were built to scale. You know your operations need attention when:

  • Forecasting gaps become visible when demand accelerates.
  • Warehouse layouts perform well under normal conditions but create congestion when volume stays elevated for weeks.
  • Labor models built for steady flow struggle when order profiles change daily.

In addition, value-added services only amplify this pressure. Kitting, labeling, compliance steps, and special packaging add complexity at the exact moment speed becomes critical. Many brands found they could move standard orders quickly, while specialized workflows slowed throughput and increased error risk. These struggles point to structural limitations within the fulfillment system, not isolated execution issues during peak.

What fulfillment performance looks like when it is correctly measured.

When brands step back in January and review fulfillment performance, the conversation changes. The focus shifts from how much was sold to how consistently the fulfillment system performed under sustained pressure.

The most useful metrics reflect stability and control. For example (using IDS metrics as a reference):

How much did peak daily volume increase compared to baseline?

    • 178% increase in daily orders

 How long did those peaks last?

    • Mid November - December 2025

What percentage of orders shipped the same day, within 24 hours, and within 48 hours?

    • 50% of all orders shipped the same day
    • 75% percent shipped within 24 hours
    • 97% percent shipped within 48 hours

How long did customers actually wait to receive their orders?

    • Average delivery time was 2.5 business days
    • Average order-to-delivery window was 4.1 days

How well were service levels and value-added requirements maintained when volume was highest.

    • Maintained 99.8% SLAs

 

These metrics reveal whether the fulfillment system scaled with demand or relied on short-term adjustments to maintain output. That distinction matters when planning for future growth.

Why Q1 is the right time to evaluate your fulfillment operations.

Brands that skip this review often repeat the same stress patterns the following year. They carry forward assumptions that held only because extra labor, expedited shipping, or manual intervention absorbed the strain. Over time, this approach limits growth and increases risk.

Q1 is the perfect time to review fulfillment performance so that you can gain clarity. Connect with your fulfillment partner to review your KPIs and SLAs to understand if your systems are built for flexibility and success. With this information, you can plan labor, space, and carrier strategies based on reality rather than best-case scenarios.

This is also a time to evaluate your fulfillment partnerships, not just your fulfillment structure. A strong fulfillment partner must offer more than speed. To ensure your fulfillment operations are built to scale with demand, your partner must bring planning discipline, system visibility, and operational flexibility that allows you to grow without hiding risk and costs inside their operation.

Defining real holiday success.

Holiday success should be measured by more than sales totals. It should be measured by how predictably orders moved, how consistently delivery promises were met, and how effectively the fulfillment system protected both customer experience and margin.

If your holiday season looked successful but might have exposed issues inside your fulfillment operation, that signal is worth addressing now.

When you’re reviewing your holiday results and want to understand what ecommerce holiday sales reports miss about fulfillment performance, a performance review can help surface the operational truth behind the numbers and guide smarter planning for the year ahead. Our 3PL RFP Template highlights the questions that show whether a provider has the infrastructure, systems, and processes to grow with your business.

 

Read more from our blog.